The Hidden Curriculum of Time and Space: Why Belonging Is Designed Before It Is Felt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71179/znnfcp11Keywords:
Belonging, Institutional design, Time and space, Student transition, Academic AdvisingAbstract
Academic advising and personal tutoring are deeply relational practices, yet they are often expected to flourish within institutional structures that unintentionally erode connection. This opinion piece argues that belonging is not simply something students feel. It is shaped by the hidden curriculum of institutional design, particularly through the organisation of time and space. Drawing on practice at a small specialist college in Ireland, it explores how timetabling, orientation sequencing, and protected periods within the weekly schedule send powerful signals to students about whether they matter. When time and space is approached as intentional design features rather than neutral administrative decisions, the conditions in which advising relationships can take root are strengthened. For advisors and tutors supporting students with limited discretionary time on campus, reframing belonging as something designed rather than delivered is increasingly essential.
References
Ferguson, E. D. (2010). Adler’s innovative contributions regarding the need to belong. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 66(1), 1–7.
Gilani, D., & Thomas, L. (2025). Understanding the factors and consequences of student belonging in higher education: A critical literature review. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 34. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1385
Jankowski, G., Deshko, D., Cameron, A., Metsik, I.-A., & Powell, A. (2025, December). How universities in Ireland can enhance student attendance, attainment, and belonging. PublicPolicy.ie. https://publicpolicy.ie/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/How-Universities-in-Ireland-Can-Enhance-Student-Attendance-Attainment-and-Belonging.pdf
Keogh, M., McKeague, B., & Casey, D. (2020). The impact of commuting on the student experience (NStEP Case Study). National Student Engagement Programme. https://studentengagement.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Keogh-et-al-Maynooth.pdf
Jones, E. (2017). Problematising and reimagining the notion of “international student experience.” Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1293880
Schlossberg, N. K. (1989). Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community. New Directions for Student Services, 1989(48), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.37119894803
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: Final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Higher Education Academy/Paul Hamlyn Foundation. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/building-student-engagement-and-belonging-higher-education-time-change-final-report
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Waypoint - A Reflective Journal of Student Advising and Development in Tertiary Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.